+1 on a checkpoints discussion if people want to have it, but could
you rethread to start it, please? It's not really about 1.5.
Thanks,
-K
"Justin Erenkrantz" <justin@erenkrantz.com> writes:
> On Oct 11, 2007 9:38 PM, Blair Zajac <blair@orcaware.com> wrote:
>> BTW, the work has been checked into a checkpoint:
>>
>> http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/checkpoints/relative-externals
>>
>> if anybody wants to take a look. A review would be appreciated.
>
> See...this is why I think checkpoints are silly. On one hand, you
> don't want reviews; on the other hand, you do. I don't get it.
>
> How am I supposed to easily review changes without diffs? Now, I have
> to go do a URL diff from trunk to checkpoints/relative-externals to
> hunt through the diffs? No thanks.
>
> I guess I'd be much happier if the commit messages on 'checkpoints'
> still included diffs. If it's a social problem we're trying to solve,
> solve it socially (ask people to not send nit-pick comments) rather
> than turning off a very important feature. -- justin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 12 18:52:20 2007