On Mon, 08 Oct 2007, Kouhei Sutou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In <20071008022612.GF24394@drac.finemaltcoding.com>
> "Re: svn commit: r27006 - trunk/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/svn" on Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:26:12 -0700,
> "Daniel L. Rall" <dlr@finemaltcoding.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 06 Oct 2007, kou@tigris.org wrote:
> >
> > > Author: kou
> > > Date: Sat Oct 6 22:47:09 2007
> > > New Revision: 27006
> > >
> > > Log:
> > > Add experimental repository synchronization implementation.
> > >
> > > * subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/svn/syncer.rb (Svn::Syncer): New class.
> >
> > How about naming this class "Syncher" instead?
>
> Syncer got more hits rather than Syncher with Google search.
> If Syncher is more popular rather than Syncer, I'll change.
> Syncher is more popular? Or Synchronizer?
I definitely prefer Synchronizer, if you don't think that it's too much
of a mouthful.
--
Daniel Rall
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Mon Oct 8 06:24:09 2007