[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: We should bump WC format version number for 1.5.

From: Erik Huelsmann <ehuels_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-10-05 17:07:44 CEST

On 10/5/07, Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> wrote:
> On Oct 5, 2007 12:45 AM, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It's possible to do this, by overloading 'svn cleanup --force' to do
> > the additional work of the upgrade... I guess the question is now how
> > the others feel about this. Should the error happen when someone wants
> > to store a depth or when someone executes a write-operation on the
> > working copy? (Or even when accessing a working copy for read-only
> > operations?)
> I don't like confusing the user - any upgrades should be transparent
> as they have been in the past. -- justin

Ah. But the fact is that transparent updates are actually more
confusing, from what I hear from admins... What's confusing about
explicit upgrades (more so that transparent ones)?



To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Oct 5 17:07:59 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.