Re: We should bump WC format version number for 1.5.

On 10/4/07, Mark Phippard <markphip@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/4/07, David Glasser <glasser@davidglasser.net> wrote:
> > On 10/4/07, Mark Phippard <markphip@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > What if we held off the bump until we would be writing the WC? One of
> > > the problems with 1.4 is anything that touched the WC rewrote it.
> > > When you are on Windows, TortoiseSVN will eventually touch every WC on
> > > your hard drive, depending on what you have built up in its cache and
> > > how often you just browse your drive with Windows Explorer.
> > >
> > > If you had to at least do an update/commit/checkout that would help a
> > > little. Then you could at least be somewhat careful and not have it
> > > happen.
> >
> > I'm pretty sure that this is the status quo --- the format is only
> > upgraded if a write lock is taken out.
>
> Maybe I am wrong, but I thought with 1.4, even something like status
> updated the WC.

Nope; just tested.

--dave

-- 
David Glasser | glasser_at_davidglasser.net | http://www.davidglasser.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org