Re: svn commit: r26937 - trunk/www

Karl Fogel wrote:
> "Hyrum K. Wright" <hyrum_wright@mail.utexas.edu> writes:
>> Ah, so it does do obfuscation.
>>
>> There's probably an obvious answer to this one, too, but what guarantees
>> two similar, but not identical, entries being next to each other? The
>> list is sorted by patch count, not lexically.
>
> Oh, whups, that was my mistake, sorry. I should make it treat "@" and
> "{_AT_}" as equivalent, so those addresses are unified.

Exactly. That's what my initial question was getting at. Having some
kind of obfuscated notation that the contribulyzer can unobfuscate would
be useful for cases like these.