> "Hyrum K. Wright" <hyrum_wright@mail.utexas.edu> writes:
>> Okay. Does this impact the contribulyzer at all? I've noticed that t=
he
>> contribulyzer actually *doesn't* obfuscate the email addresses it
>> displays, and I just haven't gotten around to fixing that yet.
>=20
> Sorry, I meant to give a longer reply:
>=20
> It does obfuscate them (do "View Source"), and using an obfuscated
> syntax in the source doesn't really hurt the contribulyzer. If the
> same address appeared in both unobfuscated and obfuscated form in the
> source logs, then they might be treated as different people by the
> contribulyzer -- but in practice, this never happens, and anyway the
> two entries would be right next to each other if it did happen. So I
> think it's not an issue.
Ah, so it does do obfuscation.
There's probably an obvious answer to this one, too, but what guarantees
two similar, but not identical, entries being next to each other? The
list is sorted by patch count, not lexically.
But, like you say, that hardly ever happens in practice.
-Hyrum
Received on Thu Oct 4 22:51:33 2007