Will "relative svn:externals" be implemented before branching 1.5.x ?
Regards.
Masaru
2007/9/5, Blair Zajac <blair@orcaware.com>:
> Karl Fogel wrote:
> > Christopher Key <cjk32@cam.ac.uk> writes:
> >> I was just wondering whether it might make more sense to instead
> >> construct repository root relatives paths as,
> >>
> >> ^/branches/1.4.x
> >>
> >> It certainly seems to more intuitive to me. '^' is a directory, just
> >> as are '..', '.' and '~', and paths relative to them are constructed
> >> as '../path', './path', '~/path', so why not treat '^' the same?
> >
> > +1, I too think this would be more consistent.
> >
> > -Karl
>
> Sounds good. We'll go with that.
>
> Regards,
> Blair
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 4 14:45:42 2007