[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: SWIG versions - why not 1.3.31 yet?

From: Dan Christian <dchristian_at_google.com>
Date: 2007-09-27 01:26:13 CEST

The Ubuntu long term support release (dapper) still ships with swig
1.3.27. It would be a (needless) pain if that was no longer
supported. Not everyone updates there OS every 6 months or enjoys
building swig from scratch.

Given that only developers are affected, what does it mean to "drop
support"? How much support effort will this really save?

-Dan C

On 9/26/07, Max Bowsher <maxb1@ukf.net> wrote:
> (1) Since 1.3.31 was released 10 months ago, it would be unreasonable
> not to support it if it is feasible to do so.
>
> (2) Given that SWIG is not required to build the bindings from a
> release, only to do development on them, or to be a release manager, I
> see no reason to support versions more than one year old, if even that
> much. If we adopted that policy, we would drop support for all versions
> prior to 1.3.29 immediately, and in two months time, drop support for
> all versions prior to 1.3.31. Or, we could just go ahead and drop
> support for all versions prior to 1.3.31 right now.
>
>
> Max.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Sep 27 01:26:29 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.