[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r25869 - in trunk/subversion: include/private libsvn_fs_fs tests/libsvn_fs

From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev_at_farside.org.uk>
Date: 2007-09-19 14:31:30 CEST

Hi Blair,

With respect to the FSFS transaction-current code you commited a while
ago...

On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 07:22:48PM -0700, blair@tigris.org wrote:
> (get_and_increment_txn_key_body):
> New function used as a callback for svn_fs_fs__with_write_lock().
> This gets the current base 36 value in transaction-current and
> increments it. It returns the original value by the baton.

I'm curious at to whether there was any reason that you chose to use the
fs-wide write-lock to update the file rather than locking the file
directly? If not, is there any reason we shouldn't change it to do so?

Regards,
Malcolm

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Wed Sep 19 14:31:42 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.