Re: [PATCH] Neon 0.27.1 released

On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 05:48:53PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Is there a reason to allow 0.27.1 but not 0.27.0? (ok, it has a
> regression, but it doesn't sound like a fatal one).
>

I don't believe so, no.

> For that matter, assuming I volunteered to do the shell/m4 work, is
> there any known reason not to accept Neon 0.25.anything, 0.26.anything
> and 0.27.anything ?

Again, no. From what I recall, we have in the past needed to blacklist
specific patch levels of Neon -- but not for a long time (since I've
been involved in Subversion). I think the current per-patch whitelist
is simply a historical leftover that we can remove now.

> Also, is there any reason for our configure script to continue
> recommending a specific Neon version when it finds none? I'm not aware
> of Neon being unstable enough to justify us pointing to the main
> download page and letting people pick the latest?
>

Likewise: probably not any more.

Now, Serf, on the other hand... ;-)

Regards,
Malcolm