-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
2007-09-16 18:39:00 Max Bowsher napisał(a):
> Mark Phippard wrote:
> > There was a brief discussion on IRC last week where a user was using
> > APR 0.9.12 and Sussman wondered why any new user would not just use
> > 1.2.x from the start. One reason is that our dependencies tarball
> > includes 0.9.x.
> >
> > Should we change this for the 1.5 release? I believe the binary
> > dependency issue has been raised in the past for a reason to not do
> > this, but wouldn't the people most likely be to affected by this
> > problem be using an APR from their distro?
>
> However, with the growing popularity of Apache 2.2.x, my opinion is that
> it is acceptable for us to change the bundled dependency APR version
+1
- --
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG7V0u/axNJ4Xo/ZERAnQkAJ4jM+nS4Em9d2Dtjo/lAKtvAYYOSQCgic2z
/aI1tlv/5YfErsWbRDoYM3M=
=z4Sv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Sep 16 18:41:31 2007