[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Bindings question: do keyword args make us name-sensitive?

From: Eric Gillespie <epg_at_pretzelnet.org>
Date: 2007-09-11 20:37:01 CEST

Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com> writes:

> "David Glasser" <glasser@davidglasser.net> writes:
> > A little voice in the back of my head tells me that it's not OK to
> > change parameter names in public APIs, because in some bindings you
> > can use the parameter name as a keyword-style arg in calls. Am I just
> > making that up?

Weeell, I know the swig-python bindings don't make use of this.
But that's been a long-standing gripe of mine. I don't know if
the ctypes stuff can do this, but I hope so.

So, yeah, I'd rather not change the names of parameters. But, I
don't think any binding uses them *yet*, so changes are OK for
now. I'd say we don't have to lock the parameter names down
until a binding starts using them.

-- 
Eric Gillespie <*> epg@pretzelnet.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Sep 11 20:33:35 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.