[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn diff --svnpatch & svn patch

From: Charles Acknin <charlesacknin_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-09-08 18:42:39 CEST

On 9/8/07, Mark Phippard <markphip@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, I do not think that was clear before. I did not think your option
> #1 was ever a real goal for this feature. It would obviously be a
> cool addition, but not a must-have at all.

Mark, could you please have a look at
and see whether "V PATCHING" part is clear on this matter? If not,
I'll try to improve so that other users don't get it wrong.

> A couple of questions:
> 1) Can patches be applied to working copies that do not have the exact
> same revisions of the files that were used to produce the patches? I
> recall this being discussed on the list in the past.

Yes, since svnpatch is revision-less and checksum-less (except for
binary files). And if your browser is still opened on notes/svnpatch,
you'll find of interest part VI :-)

> 2) Are there any public API's in your code to interrogate the patch
> contents? I am trying to think of how a visual patch apply tool like
> TortoiseMerge could be extended to show what is in the patch and allow
> the user to selectively apply portions of it.

Yeah, sounds like a great idea! Here's svn_client_patch() signature:

svn_error_t *
svn_client_patch(const char *patch_path,
                 const char *wc_path,
                 svn_boolean_t force,
                 svn_boolean_t dry_run,
                 svn_client_ctx_t *ctx,
                 apr_pool_t *pool);

@a patch_path is supposed to be the full encoded patch. The tool
could pass a subset of a patch -- the selected encoded portion -- and
svn_client_path() would do job. However (!), an editor drive is going
to happen (svn_client_patch() calls svn_wc_apply_patch() to achieve
this), which means we're waiting for open-root/close-edit commands.
So this can't just be a subset, but a subset with enclosing commands.
Besides this little constraint, I think it works: decode, display
contents to user, user selects, add enclosing commands, encode, invoke
svn_client_patch() with this encoded patch subset. I was thinking

Note that in theory, 'svn patch' is _very_ similar to 'svn merge', so
there's no reason this can't work.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Sep 8 18:39:22 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.