On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 10:02:46AM -0700, Daniel Rall wrote:
> > (For extra credit, I'd like a way to skip changes that were the result
> > of merges - can we do that already?).
>
> 'log -g' now indicates which changes were the result of a merge
> (thanks to Hyrum's GSoC project!). This info could be used to perform
> the filtering you describe. However, you might filter out meaningful
> changes in the process, so I'm somewhat leary of this suggestion...
I'd only want to do that kind of filtering on a feature branch, in which
I wouldn't expect any 'meaningful' (in the context of reviewing the
branch) changes to be the result of merges (in this case, presumably
from trunk; unless I'm missing something and there would typically be
other merge sources too?).
Regards,
Malcolm
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Fri Sep 7 00:10:43 2007