Re: svn commit: r26474 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007, Charles Acknin wrote:
> On 9/5/07, firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com> wrote:
> > Author: dlr
> > Date: Wed Sep 5 14:39:17 2007
> > New Revision: 26474
> > Log:
> > A follow-up to r26471.
> > * subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c
> > (add_file_with_history): Remove unused variables.
> Could we use -Wunused gcc flags to prevent this? I've always wondered
> why Subversion's build system doesn't. Or are those kind of semantic
> checks time-expensive for the compiler?
My version of gcc warns automatically, so long as the source file
doesn't need to be recompiled. I'm assuming that Ben's does the same
-- it's easy to miss these warnings in the long, scrolling output.
Received on Thu Sep 6 02:00:15 2007
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev