[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: git log vs. svn log

From: Charles Acknin <charlesacknin_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-09-06 00:37:31 CEST

On 9/5/07, Heikki Orsila <shd@jolt.modeemi.cs.tut.fi> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 04:36:23PM +0100, Malcolm Rowe wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 05:40:03PM +0300, Heikki Orsila wrote:
> > > $ git log -p
> > >
> > > commit 795688a4905257516886cac6f3add6ba467dfe0b
> > > Author: Heikki Orsila <shd@thingol.localdomain>
> > > Date: Wed Aug 22 23:42:24 2007 +0300
> > >
> > > Add documentation of -i and -o [DOCUMENTATION]
> > >
> > > diff --git a/pmr.1 b/pmr.1
> > > index f42235a..d3fd6d2 100644
> > > --- a/pmr.1
> > > +++ b/pmr.1
> > > @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
> > > -.TH pmr 1 "2006-11-03" Linux "user commands"
> > > +.TH pmr 1 "2007-08-22" Linux "user commands"
> > > ...
> > >
> >
> > I must admit, I'd find this useful as well.
>
> --stat is useful because I don't want to write names of the
> affected files into the changelog message.. Many people waste effort in
> writing those names, but the version control tool could
> automagically do that.. And diffstat even shows how many lines changed..

Wouldn't 'svn diff | diffstat' do the job?

Cheers,
Charles

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Sep 6 00:34:20 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.