Re: log -g shows only one log-subtree in case of multiple, independent merges

Hello Hyrum,

> If one committed revision contains multiple merges, they should indeed
> both show up in 'svn log -g'. Would you file a bug on this issue, and
> include your reproduction recipe and sample repository?

It's issue #2905.

--
Best regards,
Marc Strapetz
_____________
syntevo.com
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> Marc Strapetz wrote:
>> When committing one revision with two different, independent merges, log
>> -g shows only one of these subtrees, however I would expect to see both
>> of them. Example (for I can supply corresponding test repository):
> 
>> /trunk/dir1/file1 merged from /branches/b1
>>   (svn:mergeinfo : /branches/b15/dir1:17-20)
> 
>> /trunk/dir2/file2 merged from /branches/b2
>>   (svn:mergeinfo : /branches/b18/dir2:20)
> 
>> After committing /trunk to r21, svn log -g /trunk shows only
> 
>> r21 (merge)
>> r20 (Result of merge from: r21)
>> r17 (some other changes)
>> ...
> 
>> However, svn log -g /trunk/dir1 shows (as expected):
>> r21 (merge)
>> r18 (Result of merge from: r21)
>> r17 (some other changes)
>> ...
> 
>> and svn log -g /trunk/dir2 shows (as expected):
>> r21 (merge)
>> r20 (Result of merge from: r21)
>> r14 (some other changes)
>> ...
> 
>> Shouldn't r18 also be displayed for svn log -g /trunk?
> 
>> --
> 
> Marc,
> If one committed revision contains multiple merges, they should indeed
> both show up in 'svn log -g'.  Would you file a bug on this issue, and
> include your reproduction recipe and sample repository?
> 
> Thanks,
> -Hyrum
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org