-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Mark Phippard wrote:
> On 8/30/07, Karl Fogel <email@example.com> wrote:
>> "Mark Phippard" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>>> I propose October 12th as that date, which gives us 6 full weeks of
>>> development time, and if we get the pieces in place quickly for a
>>> release candidate, gives us enough time to get the GA out before the
>>> end of the year. Personally, I think we should shoot for end of
>>> November, so that X-Mas and holiday season does not get in the way.
>> I think it's time to set a date and mean it. We've got to get this
>> thing out before the end of the year!
> Thanks for responding. I thought this would have got more responses
> than it has.
> Hyrum, Erik, Vlad, Ivan, Eric, Blair ???
> You've all contributed a lot already and recently. You must have opinions.
I *always* have opinions. :)
Personally, I still have a few tweaks to make to the 'log -g' and 'blame
- -g' stuff, and I think I can have that done in the next couple of
weeks. There are also a couple of known issues (they are in the issue
tracker, iirc), and I plan to look at those also. I'm going to be busy
with academic pursuits for the next few months, so my time to work on
Subversion may be fairly limited.
I think branching 1.5 on October 12th would be good goal. But, I also
think that the stabilization period is going to take a while. Merge
tracking is Hard, and I just have this sneaky suspicion that we're going
to discover some interesting bugs with the increased testing when we
start releasing RCs. There's nothing wrong with that (I prefer known
bugs to unknown ones), but it's something we should remember. There's
just a lot in this release.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
To unsubscribe, e-mail: email@example.com
For additional commands, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Received on Fri Aug 31 19:30:51 2007