Re: Merging Ctypes Python Branch

'k thanks!

+1 concept (haven't reviewed)

On Aug 30, 2007, at 4:23 PM, Eric Gillespie <epg@pretzelnet.org> wrote:

> Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> The ctypes binding requires manual work each time a new API is
>> introduced? i.e. a new binding func must be written?
>
> No, the low-level binding is generated fully automatically, which
> is more than can be said for Swig. I spend a lot of time on
> typemaps with the Swig binding :(.
>
> Now, the high-level layer is different, but that's 100% value-add
> over what Swig gives us anyway. It would not be less work with
> the Swig binding.
>
> --
> Eric Gillespie <*> epg@pretzelnet.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 31 01:26:18 2007