Daniel Falk <dan.svnlist@mbx.zapto.org> writes:
> The difference between this and svnsync is that svnsync, from what I
> understand, will mirror a repository from one svn server to another.
> Svn2ftp is designed to work more like a controlled export. It doesn't
> replicate the repository, just the head revision of the repository.
> And it works over FTP, which I believe is different as well.
>
> A good example of where this might be useful could be a large website
> in a subversion repository, where once a change is committed needs to
> show up on a remote server for preview.
>
> Thanks for your response. Let me know what you think.
I guess I'm not seeing what the compelling advantage of this is over
just using Subversion itself (either 'update' or 'export'), or using
'rsync'. I presume you've seen
http://subversion.tigris.org/faq.html#website-auto-update
already?
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 21 00:09:51 2007