Re: svn commit: r26148 - trunk/www/merge-tracking

David Glasser wrote:
> On 8/20/07, Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wright@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>> David Glasser wrote:
>>> I think it might be helpful to add a single-character column to the
>>> "svn blame -g" output which indicates whether or not a given line's
>>> revision is describing a direct commit or a merge. Does this seem
>>> useful to anyone else?
>> I think that would be valuable. What kind of mark would you suggest?
>> Maybe an 'M' in the first column of output?
>
> Hmm, how about 'G', for consistency with our status letters?

Sounds good. (I had a lapse as to what our merged status letter was.)

-Hyrum