Re: Problem in switch --depth with reloacte

On 8/7/07, Senthil Kumaran S <senthil@collab.net> wrote:
> I am attaching a shell script along with this mail which helps in
> explaining a scenario which fails when --depth is used along with switch
> --relocate.
>
> If you look at the two results at the end of the script run, we can see
> that both files and immediates are doing the same job. IMHO if we do a
> --depth files then we should not get the url changed for the "."
> directory. If both immediates and files are doing the same job in case
> of switch --relocate then they must be unified or we need to document
> that in the help message.

I wonder a bit whether we ought to even support this combination. In
1.4, did we support a --non-recursive option with --relocate? It
seems like an odd use-case.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org