Re: ra-dav => ra-neon and compat guarantees

On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 03:23:14PM -0700, Eric Gillespie wrote:
> actually accomplish anything, but it is feasible. I can even see
> a semi-legitimate reason: reusing the ra_svn marshaling functions
> (semi in that I expect we discourage that and do not support it,
> but at least I can imagine why someone would try anyway, whereas
> I don't see that with ra-dav).
>

Note that (some of) the ra_svn functions are actually real public
symbols - see include/svn_ra_svn.h. I believe this is for historical
reasons only, as the other RA/FS exports are all private (e.g.
svn_ra_serf__foo), with the exception of e.g. svn_ra_serf_init().

Regards,
Malcolm