Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 6/28/07, Giovanni Bajo <rasky@develer.com> wrote:
>> And this time (if you allow me my humble two cent) get it right and
>> cut the
>> development time down to 1/10th by using a more evolved language than C.
>> Python comes to mind, but anything would do.
>
> One thing I'd hope we avoid with "Subversion 2.0" is second system
> syndrome and such a desire smacks of it.
>
> Moving away from C means we'd most likely remove all reasonable
> extensibility mechanisms. One of the reasons that I view SVN as a
> success is that we made it fairly simple for third-parties to
> integrate with SVN - C is by far the best language for that.
>
> Rewriting all of Subversion in Python/C++/Java/Ruby is also *way*
> easier said than done. As we discussed at the summit, I don't have a
> problem with the higher-level parts - such as the command-line client
> - being implemented in Python which wraps around C libraries. But,
> libsvn_wc, libsvn_repos, etc. only being accessible via Python? Yuck.
> -- justin
Agreed. I couldn't integrate the Subversion filesystem into a new asset
management system supporting thousands of RPC calls per second if it
wasn't in C and I couldn't link it to Ice or anything else I needed.
Regards,
Blair
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jun 29 06:06:08 2007