Hi All,
I love this new approach. Let me look at the code and I will
submit a new patch that takes my previous automatic conflict
resolution stuff and use the new stuff from Ben.
Take care,
Jeremy
On 6/28/07, Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@red-bean.com> wrote:
> On 6/28/07, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net> wrote:
>
> > > I like the concept, but in addition to putting a "path" into the
> > > svn_client_conflict_description_t, I'd recommend putting an "adm_access"
> > > baton. Otherwise, won't callback implementers will be lacking a vital tool
> > > for working copy manipulation?
>
> Ah, great idea. That's a vital tool, indeed.
>
> >
> > Ooh. Another thought. If Jeremy is still working on the
> > automatically-resolve-conflicts-this-way-or-that code, would it make the
> > most sense to do so as an implementation of this conflict resolution API?
>
> Yes, I've been trying to express that idea for the last few weeks. :-)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jun 28 19:13:37 2007