Re: augmented diff design patch format
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:30:19PM -0700, Eric Gillespie wrote:
> "David Glasser" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > The essential question in my view is: Is the ability to edit a patch
> > before applying it with "svn patch" valuable?
> I'm not sure about that particular case; i've heard it a few
> times, but only a few.
Agreed. I think the much more important use-case is...
> What is incredibly valuable (and common!) is reading a patch in
> email and doing code review by replying to the email. Do we
> really want to force people to send two attachments with the same
> data in different formats? I stand by my assertion that the
> second (tree-sensitive) format will simply not be there most of
> the time.
Received on Tue Jun 26 11:54:24 2007
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev