Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> writes:
> The warning definitely passes the "good enough" test.
>
> That said, I don't see a compelling need for this. I'd (personally)
> prefer mentioning 'propdel' in the help output which talks about
> "svn:executable", which is currently:
>
> svn:needs-lock - If present, indicates that the file should be locked
> before it is modified. Makes the working copy file read-only
> when it is not locked.
I did that as part of the same change. I agree, printing the warning
isn't a must-have, but I think the case for doing it is stronger than
the case for not... Plus, I was really looking forward to a change
that I could begin and end in one sitting :-). A lot of code got
cleaned up, too (see r25486).
-K
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jun 21 20:46:55 2007