[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r25430 - in trunk/subversion: include include/private libsvn_fs_fs mod_dav_svn tests/libsvn_fs

From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev_at_farside.org.uk>
Date: 2007-06-18 19:24:17 CEST

Hi Blair,

(I've been on holiday recently, so I probably missed any discussion of this.)

On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 04:53:45PM -0700, blair@tigris.org wrote:
> Make the FSFS backend do a much better job of generating unique,
> unused transaction names. This will help in long-running
> transactions.
> * subversion/include/svn_fs.h:
> Add a note on transaction name generation and how the BDB and FSFS
> backends generate transaction names and how transaction name reuse
> could occur for each backend.

Not that I disagree with this change at all, but I'm curious as to what
sparked it? As far as I was aware, we hadn't guaranteed that
transaction names weren't reused before - when does it make a difference?


  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Mon Jun 18 19:24:25 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.