[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Serf as default DAV client?

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: 2007-06-09 02:08:52 CEST

On 6/8/07, Eric Gillespie <epg@pretzelnet.org> wrote:
> No, we've tried at Google, as well. It's got a long way to go.
> That's my point: as long as it sits there unused, it's not going
> to get any better. As a matter of fact, it seems likely to me
> that it's only going to get worse.

I kinda doubt it's got a 'long way to go' - it passes all of the
regression tests on trunk - or did the last time I checked. True,
ra_serf may need some polishing or a feature here or there - but I
don't think it's going to need *massive* amounts of work - just people
who are willing to add the features they think are missing before it
is acceptable to them. But, it shouldn't need a tremendous amount of
effort as all of the hard stuff is already done...

FWIW, on serf-dev, Lieven said that he was looking into SSPI and that
it looked fairly straightforward to add. *shrug*

Again, ra_serf 'works for me' - I use it without issues. I'd advocate
flipping the default on trunk and any lingering bugs will get worked
out really fast. =) For those who really want the features that only
neon provides, it'll still be there ready to be used - I don't see the
harm in trying it. -- justin

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Jun 9 02:09:09 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.