Eric,
When I said that, "now" meant the email you sent and that Karl
reiterated upon. :)
Take care,
Jeremy
On 6/8/07, Eric Gillespie <epg@pretzelnet.org> wrote:
> Jeremy, i'll get to your other message today, i promise :)
>
> "Jeremy Whitlock" <jcscoobyrs@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Hi All,
> > Makes sense to me. Remember, this has been discussed and until
> > now, no one had actually made a concrete request to change the
> > verbiage. The verbiage will be changes in all necessary locations.
>
> Well, hold on now!
>
> > On 6/8/07, Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com> wrote:
> > > Eric Gillespie <epg@pretzelnet.org> writes:
> > > > Unfortunately, i don't think we've finished painting this
> > > > particular bikeshed yet ;->. I finally went and got myself a
> > > > conflict so i could see if we could take name inspiration from
> > > > there. So, how about svn_accept_{old,new,work} with strings
> > > > "left", "new", and "working"?
> > >
> > > I can't believe I'm writing this, http://green.bikeshed.com/, etc, but:
> > > let's avoid needless grammar variations. svn_accept_{old,new,working}
> > > would perfectly match the adjectives we actually use.
>
> It's not just a bikeshed; this is a UI consitency question. The
> files are called "left", "right", and "working". It seems
> logical to me to use those names, not expect the user to run a
> map in his head.
>
> As for the svn_accept_t values, yeah, bikeshed, who cares. I
> thought we should try to match the conflict fields in
> svn_wc_entry_t, but maybe it's better to match the strings.
>
> --
> Eric Gillespie <*> epg@pretzelnet.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jun 8 19:33:03 2007