Re: Revert r23264 for the sake of zsh?
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Justin Erenkrantz]
> > Anyone know what the rationale for this was? The fact that it
> > absolutely kills zsh is *very* annoying and I view this as a
> > regression compared to 1.4. While zsh could (should) fix it
> > upstream
> The completion functionality seems more tightly tied to the Subversion
> version than to the zsh version. If that is the case, why not just
> distribute it in contrib, as you do with the bash completion
> Barring that, I'd say send a patch for case-insensitive 'ARG' to zsh
> regardless of whether 1.5 will release with this change, as it _is_ a
> correct change and ought to be in 1.6 if not 1.5.
> Anyway, I don't like the idea of reverting a consistency fix in the
> help text simply because someone is trying to _parse_ it.
This sure does sound like a PITA. However, I concur with Peter on
Received on Tue Jun 5 23:06:59 2007
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev