Re: RFC: Subversion trademark policy

> My personal opinion is that apps with reverse engineered protocols

Your sentence seems to leave a little bad taste about people which are keen
to implement the subversion client side stuff in non-C(++) languages
themself. You can be ensured, that we do a lot of effort to keep our SVN
client compatible with your libraries. Anything else would be hara-kiri.

What other name you suggest, for instance, for applications like SmartSVN,
so the user knows that the application is related to Subversion/SVN?

--
Best regards,
Thomas Singer
_____________
SyntEvo GmbH
Brunnfeld 11
83404 Ainring
Germany
www.syntevo.com
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 6/2/07, Peter Samuelson <peter@p12n.org> wrote:
>> Alternatively you could say explicitly that you do not intend for
>> "Subversion protocol" to be protected by your trademarks at all.
> 
> My personal opinion is that apps with reverse engineered protocols
> have no right to the Subversion trademark - only apps that directly
> use our libraries can use our name.  -- justin
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
> 
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org