yes, and using the server is not deserving this, hehe. its then a
"you-know-who" client connecting via "the who must not be named"
protocol. and on debian linux this insane tool is then called
"conspiracy". the command set is then "con update", etc.
*rotfl*
solo
On 6/2/07, Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> wrote:
> On 6/2/07, Peter Samuelson <peter@p12n.org> wrote:
> > Alternatively you could say explicitly that you do not intend for
> > "Subversion protocol" to be protected by your trademarks at all.
>
> My personal opinion is that apps with reverse engineered protocols
> have no right to the Subversion trademark - only apps that directly
> use our libraries can use our name. -- justin
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Jun 3 05:31:24 2007