Re: New (1.5) feature questions -- things we need to address before a release can happen

"Mark Phippard" <markphip@gmail.com> writes:
> It seems like if the server can seamlessly re-direct a commit to the
> master server, it could potentially do the same for an update, when it
> detected the need.
>
> That being said, doing so might cover up that there is a problem with
> the slave server that no one realizes exists. It seems like if the
> client got an error, but was no worse for it once the slave was synced
> would be the ideal.

That would certainly be the easiest thing to do; it might be a good
way to start, then we can see how annoying it is and make a more
sophisticated behavior if necessary.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 21 00:40:24 2007