[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: apr_dbd vs. direct sqlite (was Re: searchable revprops?)

From: Eric Gillespie <epg_at_pretzelnet.org>
Date: 2007-05-15 22:36:39 CEST

"Garrett Rooney" <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:

> apr_dbd is rather new (i.e. not in apr-util 0.9.x), and doesn't solve

People are still using that? 1.2's been out for a while... I
understand we can't *break* people using 0.9.x when they upgrade
to new versions, but who says the *new* features have to be
usable with the old stuff?

> many of the problems with swapping new db back ends in (i.e. sql
> dialect differences), so I'd recommend sticking with raw sqlite unless
> there's a pressing reason not to do so.

Dan Berlin assured me that svn uses a narrow subset of SQL, and
should work with any back-end.

-- 
Eric Gillespie <*> epg@pretzelnet.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 15 22:38:06 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.