Re: [patch] ruby bindings tracking the recurse=>depth changes in svn_client_proplist3
From: Kouhei Sutou <kou_at_cozmixng.org>
Date: 2007-05-15 06:07:08 CEST
Hi,
2007/5/15, Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net>:
> > >FWIW, I like the use of an explicit value, as it makes the code more
Yes. You're right. I'll do what you say if it doesn't affect API usage.
def x(a, b, c=1, d=2, e=3)
And I want to specify a, b, and d and use default value for c and e.
x(1, 2, nil, 3)
But I can't do the above because I can't specify d without dropping
But if x is defined as the following:
def x(a, b, c=nil, d=nil, e=nil)
I can specify d and use default value for c like the following:
x(1, 2, nil, 3)
In this case, it's OK for me to change like the following:
def proplist(target, rev=nil, peg_rev=nil, depth=nil, &block)
# I have a plan for improving API.
> Looks like you made a change in r25016 to support use of symbols in
No. I just noticed and implemented that. There is no more
Thanks,
-- kou --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Tue May 15 06:07:17 2007 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.