Re: merge-tracking -- getting my feet wet

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> Ah, that explains my confusion. These aren't endpoints being compared
> with each other, as in typical 'svn merge' or 'svn diff' invocations.
> You're saying that an svn_merge_range_t is just a *list* of revisions
> to merge?

And if _you_ are confused, think about the random user who has no idea
what is going on internally. This is inconsistent with every other
merge-like operation, so I think this may call for a redesign (at least
of the user interface). Is it sufficient to say display (r-1):r (where
svn_merge_range_t contains just r)?

John

-- 
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Boulevard
Suite H
Lanham, MD  20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5748
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org