-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> On 28/04/2007 19.30, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> dlr things that the performance hit here could be pretty substantial.
>
> Well possible, but I wonder about the tradeoff. Do we have numbers? Is
> it much slower also for files which don't have any merge information
> (that is, it affects also people not using branches at all, or not
> merging so often)?
We probably won't have numbers until after it is implemented. :) After
that, it should be as simple as throwing a switch somewhere, if we
decide to make this behavior the default.
I'm still not sold on that, though. There's also the question of
backwards compatibility, and I'm not sure that changing blame output
like this would keep that intact. Are there scripts which could use
blame output to determine who performed a merge? Might they depend on
the current behavior? Having this on by default would break such things.
- -Hyrum
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGM/KnCwOubk4kUXwRAso+AJ9cv5j8Z8J74MGZ9cGMh4dMdnac+ACfTnNg
CchCQs1zDykn4wHoqClRYpk=
=I0Hv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Apr 29 03:18:09 2007