Re: Changed handling of conflict file extensions is a usability regression in some situations

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: 2007-04-26 07:18:44 CEST

On 4/25/07, Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> wrote:
> > As a result, I think the new conflict filename behaviour should be
> > deactivated by default.
>
> Yeah, or removed entirely.

+1.

(I think the new scheme is far far worse than what we had before.) -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Apr 26 07:18:53 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dick Kruithof: "Trailing slash bug on windows shares"
Previous message: Karl Fogel: "Re: Change of file case confuses svn status on case insensitive file systems"
In reply to: Daniel Rall: "Re: Changed handling of conflict file extensions is a usability regression in some situations"
Next in thread: C. Michael Pilato: "Re: Changed handling of conflict file extensions is a usability regression in some situations"
Reply: C. Michael Pilato: "Re: Changed handling of conflict file extensions is a usability regression in some situations"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]