Re: JavaHL: function inlining
Daniel Rall wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> There are several small and frequently called functions in the JavaHL
>> C++ classes which could be inlined by the compiler. (One example is the
>> Pool::pool() function.) By having the compiler inline such functions,
>> overhead is eliminated, and other optimizations possibly performed. C++
>> provides the "inline" keyword to allow us to suggest that the compiler
>> inline these functions. (Actual inlining is up to the compiler, but
>> most compilers worth their salt will inline these types of functions
>> regardless of the "inline" keyword.)
>> The catch here is that the function implementation must be moved to the
>> header file, so that it is available to each source file upon
>> compilation. The function definition now becomes part of the interface,
>> and code compiled against different versions of the function are now no
>> longer binarily compatible. Because we make no compatibility guarantees
>> within JavaHL itself, I don't see this as a problem.
> We haven't been trying to keep binary compatibility at the C++ level;
> it's considered part of the implementation, rather than part of the
> public interface (as the Java APIs are). Go for it.
> Question: Should you be using APR_INLINE, as we do in core
> Subversion's C code?
Yup. I've done that for the Pool class in r24662. I'll take a look at
which other functions could benefit from this treatment.
Received on Thu Apr 19 21:04:04 2007
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev