[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Merge Tracking Auditing - SoC

From: Daniel Rall <dlr_at_collab.net>
Date: 2007-04-17 18:37:53 CEST

On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:

> Daniel Rall wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> ...
> >> * In the case of svn log, would the user be better served if we just
> >> included the original revision logs in line with the logs (i.e., no
> >> special indentation, etc.)?
> >
> > A good case has been made for no indentation. Some indication of that
> > we're not showing the actual log message would be useful.
> I'm having trouble parsing that last sentence. Would you mind restating it?

If we decide not to show the *actual* log message used with a commit
(which would be consistent with what we're going to do for 'blame'),
some indication in the output of the *original* log message(s) that
they aren't the actual log message, and are being displayed in lieu of
the actual message, might be useful.

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Tue Apr 17 18:38:27 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.