Re: Releasing 1.0.10, 1.1.5, 1.2.4 and 1.3.3

From: Michael Brouwer <mb.7766_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-04-07 00:52:11 CEST

Did anyone consider the irony of that statement? People using certain open
source software distros are stuck using 2 year old open source software and
yet people running a commercial OS can happily use the latest and greatest
version of an open source project.

Michael

On 4/6/07, Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> wrote:
>
>
> While this is inconsistent with our release process, I tend to agree.
> This is a reasonable place to cut a corner -- Windows users are much
> less likely to be stuck on an older version of Subversion.
>
>
Received on Sat Apr 7 00:52:23 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Eric Gillespie: "[PATCH] Re: Is mod_dav_svn safe for use in a threaded MPM?"
Previous message: David James: "Re: Proof of concept higher-level python bindings for SoC project"
In reply to: Daniel Rall: "Re: Releasing 1.0.10, 1.1.5, 1.2.4 and 1.3.3"
Next in thread: Malcolm Rowe: "Re: Releasing 1.0.10, 1.1.5, 1.2.4 and 1.3.3"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]