[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Releasing 1.0.10, 1.1.5, 1.2.4 and 1.3.3

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2007-04-05 19:54:08 CEST

Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 4/5/07, Michael Sinz <Michael.Sinz@sinz.org> wrote:
>> Having said that - being that Subversion is version control,
>> I would hope that we could at least show that we can maintain
>> older branches with the system - it may just be a bit harder to
>> get enough people to spend the time to test/sign the archive.
> Asking folks to sign and test *four* releases for a non-problem for
> 99% of the world is a waste of time. IF this impacted clients, then
> maybe I could justify the effort - but not for when it's server-side
> only and only impacts those who use BDB (which hasn't been the default
> in ages). -- justin

The bug is not limited to BDB, Justin. *Both* backends see the directory
property changes disappear without user-visible record ('svn log' won't show
it... not sure how it affects 'svnadmin dump'). It's just the BDB backend
as the *additional* problem of the delta chain cycle.

C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on Thu Apr 5 19:54:22 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.