Re: [PATCH] Make fsfs survive stale NFS file handles

From: David James <james_at_cs.toronto.edu>
Date: 2007-04-05 17:38:16 CEST

On 4/5/07, Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev@farside.org.uk> wrote:
> > +/* Long enough to hold: "<svn_revnum_t> <node id> <copy id>\0"
> > + * 19 bytes for svn_revnum_t (long)
>
> That's 10 bytes for a long, 19 bytes would be for a hypothetical 64-bit
> revision number.

(Actually, on 64-bit Linux, "long" is 64 bits, I believe.)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Apr 5 17:38:30 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Kamesh Jayachandran: "Re: [PATCH] remove redundant code"
Previous message: Bhuvaneswaran Arumugam: "Re: [PATCH] libsvn_fs_util: Move functions from fs.c to fs-util.c"
In reply to: Malcolm Rowe: "Re: [PATCH] Make fsfs survive stale NFS file handles"
Next in thread: Malcolm Rowe: "Re: [PATCH] Make fsfs survive stale NFS file handles"
Reply: Malcolm Rowe: "Re: [PATCH] Make fsfs survive stale NFS file handles"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]