On 4/5/07, Max Bowsher <maxb1@ukf.net> wrote:
> Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> > Ok, so I've done all the backporting for 1.0 .. 1.3 for the issue 2751
> > fix (rare FS corruption) because there are even occasional reports on
> > users@ which relate to 1.0. I want all distros to be able to do a new
> > release if and when they still do maintenance for anything which
> > includes a post 1.0 release of Subversion.
> >
> > All I need to do is to commit the backport for 1.3.
> >
> > Now for the process: David Anderson is normally our RM. David, do you
> > want to do this lot, or do you need help?
> >
> > I'm hoping to get this fix out the door as quickly as we can. As in:
> > by the end of next week.
> >
> > Comments?
>
> Eeek!
>
> Reconstructing build environments for 1.[0123].x is not going to be trivial.
Sure. But asking is free isn't it? I think 1.4.4 and 1.1.5 are the
important ones though. 1.4.4 needs no explanation and 1.1.x is still
widely in use on Debian derived sysytems (1.1.4 is in Sarge).
> At very least, we're going to need to unpack the previous tarball and
> zipfile of each line, determine the bundled apr/apr-util/neon versions
> were bundled, then diff the re-rolled tarball/zipfile with the previous
> one to check that oddness hasn't crept in.
>
> If someone's feeling keen, they could start by working up a table of
> dependency versions included in each release line.
Bye,
Erik.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Apr 5 09:02:55 2007