On Tue, 03 Apr 2007, Malcolm Rowe wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 09:43:16AM -0700, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > --- trunk/www/faq.html (original)
> > +++ trunk/www/faq.html Mon Apr 2 09:43:16 2007
> > @@ -3151,11 +3151,12 @@
> > +<p>There is <a href="http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34332"
> > +>a bug in APR 0.9.6</a> that is present when it is running on Tiger,
> > +<p>Currently, the best solution is to upgrade to APR 1.2.0+.</p>
> > +
> If the bug is in APR 0.9.6, why is upgrading to 1.2.0 (and not, say,
> 0.9.7) the best solution?
The APR change log referenced in the Subversion revision referenced by
ASF Bugzilla issue #34332 indicates that the bug was fixed in 1.2.0.
However, I heard from a co-worker that 0.9.6 contains the fix also
(which doesn't make any sense to me, since that's the release where
the problem was reported in the first place). I need to check APR's
source code for its older tags to confirm.
Received on Wed Apr 4 02:30:30 2007
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored