Backport of r22311 - is the branch complete?

Hi CL,

Is the backport branch for r22311 ready for backport? We have enough
votes, but I notice you haven't voted on the change yourself - are you
still testing it?

On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 01:36:02AM -0700, malcolm@tigris.org wrote:
> * r20667 (part), (r22311, already in 1.4.x)
> Make svn_ra_do_{update,switch,status} work with the SWIG/Perl bindings.
> Notes:
> Backport of r22311 was originally attempted in r22694, but merge was
> botched due to an incomplete listing in STATUS (r22311 depends upon
> additional supporting code in r20667, which wasn't backported).
> Justification:
> Would be nice to fix something we already said we'd fixed in 1.4.3.
> Branch: 1.4.x-r22311 (-c24188)
> Votes:
> +1: cmpilato
> +0: malcolm, dlr

Regards,
Malcolm