[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: "SVNAuthorizationShortCircuit or something similar"

From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev_at_farside.org.uk>
Date: 2007-04-03 09:32:35 CEST

On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 04:03:37PM -0700, Josh Gilkerson wrote:
> Are there suggestions for the directive name/syntax? Suggestions:
> SVNAuthorizationShortCircuit [yes|no]
> SVNDavAuthzDirect <provider_name>

(Why would we need more than one provider?)

I remember that in the past we've discussed extending SVNPathAuthz to
accept <apache|native|off> (plus 'on' as an alias for 'apache').

(We even discussed making it mandatory (no default) because of the
performance impact of the default behaviour. That would ensure that
people knew what they were getting, and could switch it off if, as is
most likely, it wasn't needed. That's probably going too far, though).


  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Tue Apr 3 09:33:29 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.