D.J. Heap wrote:
> On 4/1/07, Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> wrote:
> [snip]
>> >
>> > I'm not deadly on the details, but is that pretty much the only way to
>> > actually fix this? We have a common_pool in the loader that appears
>> > to be trying to address this same kind of issue -- is there some way
>> > to pass it down so the bdb cache can use that? Or is that pool
>> > inappropriate for some reason?
>>
>> In your case, we don't control the pool that "owns" mod_dav_svn.so --
>> HTTPD does. I suppose we could try changing the way HTTPD handles module
>> unloading.
>
>
> Right, but we know when mod_dav_svn.so is loaded and unloaded don't
> we? Couldn't we make our own global (or child) pool at init and clean
> it up in uninit? I thought I saw the requisite entry points in
> mod_dav_svn.so, but maybe I'm mistaken.
I suppose we could, if such hooks are available -- but then we'd have to
propagate that pool somehow to the libsvn_fs_bdb cache.
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Apr 1 22:23:13 2007