"Mark Phippard" <markphip@gmail.com> writes:
> FWIW, I would only view the roadmap as being "solid" for the release
> currently being developed. The rest would evolve. Maybe the roadmap
> calls for true renames phase 1 in 1.6 and phase 2 in 1.7, but other
> than that, 1.7 might not have much else committed to it at this point.
> This was my point about not putting things on the roadmap unless
> someone has taken some effort to show commitment. It does not do any
> good to put true renames on the roadmap, as an example, if the feature
> does not have some kind of basic proposed design and also some people
> that say they want to work on it. I would say features in this state
> belong on some kind of feature wishlist. Maybe new developers coming
> to the project can take that list and do the steps needed to get a
> feature committed to the roadmap.
Ah, okay, +1. (This may be how we've settled into operating
already... but it can't hurt to formalize it.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Mar 29 03:25:12 2007